Drug Abuse Essays (199 words) - Neurochemistry, Drug Culture

Medication Abuse Medication misuse can be known as the incomparable American scourge. Medications are fit for assuming control over one's psyche and body. Medication misuse obliterates families, companionships, connections, and in particular medications at last devastate their client. Consistently Americans burn through $84 billion dollars (1) to fuel their war on drugs. Cash saying we won't let drugs devastate our general public. Medications are fit for not just wrecking American culture; they are likewise equipped for obliterating Americans. Rocks has been a significant pestilence in the United States since the mid 1980's. Rocks is a smokeable type of the medication and it's utilization has been a defeat of most major downtowns in the US. Break pulverizes it's clients will to do anything other than smoke increasingly rocks. Break is one of the most addictive medications on earth, and its clients will go to freakish boundaries to get the medication. Clients of this medication will execute, assault, take, and even whore themselves to get progressively split. Such conduct has a grave, negative effect on society by spreading explicitly transmitted ailments through prostitution and raising the crime percentages through murder and theft. It is unnerving to think there are individuals campaigning in Reasoning

How Does SAT Essay Length Affect Your Score

How Does SAT Essay Length Affect Your Score SAT/ACT Prep Online Guides and Tips Valid or False: Since article length isn't referenced in the SAT paper evaluating rubric, it doesn’t matter the amount you write in your exposition. Answer: True...but additionally bogus. Peruse on for a clarification of why and how the length of your SAT exposition can influence your score. include picture credit: How long by Martin Abegglen, utilized under CC BY-SA 2.0/Cropped changed from unique. For what reason Does Essay Length Matter? For what reason would you imagine that article length even issues in any case? As I said in the presentation, it's not as though the SAT exposition rubric makes reference to paper length by any means. All things considered, there's at any rate one valid justification to think this: article length is emphatically connected with paper score. Since the time the article was added to the SAT, ebb and flow MIT look into offshoot (and previous chief of the MIT undergrad composing program) Les Perelman has been vocal about how the more drawn out an exposition is, the almost certain it is to get a higher score. As indicated by this 2005 New York Times article by Michael Winerip, Perelman broke down the lengths and scores of 54 SAT-affirmed test expositions and found an almost 90% connection. The briefest papers (around 100 words) got the least conceivable score, 1 (or a joined score of 2 out of 12), while the longest articles (around 400 words), got the most noteworthy score, a 6 (or a consolidated score of 12 out of 12). In view of these discoveries, delegates of the CollegeBoard expressed that they would be discharging shorter instances of higher-scoring articles. This discussion initially emitted in mid 2005, directly after the new SAT paper was presented. To check whether there had been any progressions from that point forward, I did my own investigation of the papers in the CollegeBoard's exposition scoring guide that were totally written because of the example brief. Investigate what I found: Reward chart perusing practice for you in this, an article on papers. The pleasure is all mine. As should be obvious, as paper length (estimated by word include in the chart above) expands, the score additionally increments. Because longer papers will in general score better, in any case, doesn’t imply that you should simply compose the word â€Å"ideology† again and again to top off the page. The explanation longer articles will in general score better is that understudies who compose longer expositions offer more help for their postulations. On the off chance that this is the paper brief: Is it imperative to scrutinize the thoughts and choices of individuals in places of power, and all you compose is the accompanying: It's imperative to address authority in light of the fact that occasionally authority prevents you from doing things you need. Like getting a horse. I need a horse. I need a horse. I need a horse. I need a horse. for two pages, you'll despite everything get a 0. Perhaps a 1, if the grader is feeling liberal and believes that you made some endeavor to expound on the issue talked about in a brief. For additional on the manner of thinking of exposition evaluating, read our article about bits of knowledge from genuine SAT paper graders. Also, on the off chance that you attempt to haul out one model by composing bigger than expected and rehashing similar realities and data again and again, it won't consequently get you a higher score. Truth be told, you may lose focuses if both of your article's graders believe that your rehashing of data prompts absence of cognizance in your composition. Regardless, except if you have amazingly little penmanship, it’s hard to compose an exposition that presents a postulation and supports it with in any event two explicit models in under one page. Messy hair day by Brian Snelson, utilized under CC BY 2.0/Cropped from unique. Truly, however. See that face. Wouldn't you need a horse? So How Long Should Your Essay Be? Numerous elements go into deciding paper length, which makes it hard to give a sweeping length suggestion. Here are the most significant variables with regards to length of your SAT paper: Jargon. Regularly, the further developed vocab you use, the less words you’ll need to take care of business, which may bring about a shorter exposition. Penmanship size. Understudies with bigger penmanship will normally occupy more room on the page than understudies with littler penmanship. This doesn't really mean understudies with bigger penmanship have a bit of leeway, in any case; truth be told, understudies with bigger penmanship will in general run into the issue of having filled two pages and not got done with saying all that they required or needed to state. How quick you can compose and think. On the off chance that you have to take more time to design out your paper, you may wind up composing a shorter article, just in light of the fact that you don't have as much time to compose. That doesn't really imply that you'll do more awful on the exposition - since a sorted out paper with solid explicit models will score superior to a disarranged one without explicit models - yet it means that you may wind up with less time to work out your thoughts. How much time you leave yourself to compose (versus how much time you take to design). This is something you have to make sense of for yourself through training and perception. Throughout the years, I've understood that I can compose decently fast, which implies that it's alright on the off chance that I set aside somewhat more effort to design out my paper - I'll despite everything have the option to top off those two pages. Then again, on the off chance that you find that you're a moderate author, you probably won't have the option to compose enough except if you get quick at arranging your exposition. All in all, expecting around 150 words for every written by hand page, you have to compose at any rate a page and a half (1.5 pages) to get a 3 or above on your paper (or a joined score of 6 or above). You'll require at any rate that much space to state what you have to state and bolster it plainly with solid models. What’s Next? Need to discover progressively about how to compose a decent SAT article? Watch us compose a top-scoring exposition bit by bit, at that point look at our tips on the best way to compose a since a long time ago SAT paper just as our progressively broad SAT article tips. Find the key to getting an ideal 12 on your SAT paper here. Imagine a scenario in which you're anticipating taking the new SAT. Peruse our breakdown of the new SAT exposition here. Need to quit fooling around about improving your SAT score? We have the main online SAT prep program that will raise your score by 160+ focuses, ensured. Restrictive to our program, we have a specialist SAT teacher grade every one of your SAT expositions and give you modified criticism on the most proficient method to improve your score. Look at our 5-day let loose preliminary and sign for nothing:

The Third Side of Fraternities

The Third Side of Fraternities PREMISES 1. This is an OPINION post. Not a suggestion post. Im not trying to debate about housing or even recommend to you what you should do. Im just trying to be honest. 2. When I explain what goes on in fraternities, Im basing everything primarily on my fraternity. The two dozen plus fraternities at MIT do not all have the same personality, so its not fair to categorize fraternal life into one big stereotype, whatever your stereotype may be. 3. I may not be always politically correct. I apologize for that in advance. Paul joined a fraternity, and now lives at his fraternity. Snively didnt join a fraternity, and lives at his dorm. I joined a fraternity, but I live at iHouse, a specialized dorm of 21 students (and Im not planning on moving out anytime soon). Not to jump on the bandwagon, but I think I supply the missing third side to this housing issue. But granted, I think theres a lot fewer students that live in a small dorm but is part of a fraternity, so I dont know how much my opinion matters or would apply to future students, but here goes. First off, I dont know when the dorms/fraternity debate became so heated. I just want to start off by saying that theres no reason to bash one or the other (Im not referring to anyone in particular), but dorm life and fraternal life is so different that I dont think it would be fair to compare one or the other on par. Joining a fraternity doesnt mean youre paying for friends, nor does not getting a bid during Rush imply that you are socially awkward. Being a fraternity guy, I just want to kind of talk about Rush. Like what numerous people have mentioned, Rush is not perfect. I wrote two entries ago that you should explore around a bit in the beginning (which is still good and sound advice), but I guess what I didnt emphasize is that if you really WANTED a bid, you need to settle down into one fraternity probably midway through Rush. So, precisely as Snively said, if you did Rush right (by constantly going to all the different fraternities), you might end up with no bids at all by the time Rush week ends. Equally flawed is the idea that you suddenly become brothers with people that you know after just one short week. After all, is it really possible for you do find the best match for your next four years by which dinners you chose to go to during Rush week? And, like mentioned in Snivelys entry, there is no pretty solution to this dilemma. But let me explain a bit about what goes on in chapter rooms during Rush week and the week before Rush (Work Week). I think this aspect is often skimmed over and thus it makes the process of Rush seem arbitrary and random, but there is a lot that goes on in fraternities before extending a bid. Getting a bid is a carefully, well-thought out process, and definitely not something that you get just because you show up to all the Rush events for a specific fraternity (but this is a popular misconception). One week prior to Rush week, the brothers who can make it back from MIT return to campus, and try begin planning for Rush. During this Work Week, renovations may be done on the house, assignments for Rush events are handed out, and the brothers generally hang out with each other after a long summer. Once Rush begins, different brothers are assigned to head events that happen each day, and each member of the fraternity try to go out and meet as many freshmen as possible. At the end of every night, all the fraternity men gather together at the house, plan tomorrows events, and talk about freshmen that they met today who may make good potentials. As Rush goes on, it becomes more and more important for interested freshmen to stick with a fraternity because basically there is no way for us to get to know you better if we only see you at one event! This is the reason why, technically, you need to settle into just one or two fraternities through middle of Rush week. This also facilitates for better discussion amongst the brothers at night because they would have known you better and thus have more things to say. Also, as the brothers get to know you better, the daily discussions would often progress from just general chatting (interests, activities) and hanging out to more serious discussions, such as what it means to join a fraternity and things like your values, ideals, ideasetc. Often, if you find that the attitude and the topics of discussion between you and the fraternity brothers segue into deeper talks, its a good sign that the brothers are considering you seriously as a potential future member of their fraternity. Towards the end of Rush week, especially the last two nights of Rush Week, the nightly meetings amongst the fraternity men get progressively longer and longer. As interested potentials start getting singled out, the discussions of the relative impressions and merits of each potential become the subject of careful examination (which often turns into long discussions). The meeting before Bid Day, (when bids or invitations to join the fraternity, are handed out to potentials) is often the longest meeting, as all the brothers go through all the potentials that still remain in the database and proceeds to talk about whether or not to extend a bid to them (for controversial potentials, it may even lead to debates). Last night was that meeting for my fraternity, and the brothers of my fraternity met for nearly five hours. Still think that getting a bid is arbitrary? For every night in the past week, there was practically no evening when I returned to my dorm before midnight, and often it was not until three in the morning. All of this effort goes into helping my fraternity select the best potentials as possible the potentials whom we believe best exemplifies our ideals and would contribute to our fraternal environment. Still, you protest, how is it possible for you to know whether youre the best fit for us in just ONE week?! I want to address this from two angles: First off, I believe that for a great number of potentials who accept bids from different fraternities, they start growing into the personalities and the character of the fraternity they join (and I think the same is true for a lot of dorm communities). Thus, in a lot of cases, you dont need to be best fit from the very beginning, since as time goes on and you get to know your brothers better, whichever fraternity you join would become the best fraternity for you. Moreover, after awhile, you really have no basis of comparison anyway (how would you know whether you would have been happier at another fraternity?) Although growing into the personality of the fraternity sounds risky and feels like youre losing the essence of your own personality, its not really the case. The personality of the fraternity is defined by the existing brothers who are part of the fraternity, and if you feel comfortable about them in the beginning, chances are that feeling wont fade as times go on (obviously, there are exceptions, but thats generally minor and besides the point). Second, this is the reason why my fraternity recruit year-round. If you dont feel comfortable joining, we wont force you. Plenty of potentials had turned down bids from us, but reconsidered their decision as they got to know us better. Moreover, doing Rush during your freshman year isnt mandatory, by any means! You may decide your sophomore year, after youve spent a year at MIT and gotten to know a bit more about Greek life, to Rush a particular fraternity that you find valuable. No one is asking you to make an impulsive decision. If you dont feel comfortable, then just leave! I dont know too much about other fraternities, but I know for a fact that my brothers and I would not just give you the cold shoulder after Rush if you turn down a bid from us. There are a lot of comments about the Rush process being judgmental and quiet kids getting shafted. I apologize about that stereotype as a fraternal member, but I maintain the stance that there is really no way to not come off as judgmental to some people when you only have a week to meet them! My fraternity places a key emphasis on trying not to perpetuate this bitter feeling, and thus we welcome you to continue to explore and talk to us throughout the year. At least for us (and I know at least of a couple more fraternities), Rush doesnt end after this week, if you dont want it to. - Now leaving fraternities, and talking about dorm-life. I love iHouse. I enjoy the intimacies that iHouse offers, with just 21 people in the dorm. Like wings in Baker and Next, entries in McGregor, or houses in Burton Conner, we are a community. Throughout the year, we discuss issues about international development, plan potential projects, go on awesome retreats, have great speaker dinners, and most importantly, just hang out and learn from each other by living with each other. You may have known Zach and Steve, my roommates from last year, from various blogs that I posted last year (if you dont, click on the iHouse link on the very top it redirects to our i3 video, which both of them were featured. I was the cameraman. =p). Throughout the last year, I dont know how many times Zach helped out on my physics psets, and helped me to secure the needed 85.2% (0.2% above the A cutoff!) for me to net that 5.0 GPA in 8.02. Steve was there with me through the presidential primaries, explaining to me which states were the key battleground states. He also introduced me to the world of American sports, and I remember all the time he spent in front of the television, waiting for the Patriots to lose, but being disappointed every time. And of course, they would remember the time when I almost burned down the room because my lamp nearly caught on fire at three in the morning (while theyre both deep asleep!). Going outside of the room, theres Tim 08, who would always be phenomenally annoyed when late-night revelers partied too loudly in the lounge (late-night was defined as past 10pm for him). Theres also Kathy 10, who taught me the secret of making really easy (but awesome-tasting!) garlic noodles, for which she is famous for. I remember staying up till 6 in the morning doing my 5.111 homework with Mary 11, who could have gone to sleep but wanted to stay up with me since I was up doing work. She fell asleep while studying 5.12 (which was her pretext of staying up), but I would remember that time when we were both so delirious from working at the end that we just stopped working to see the sun rise across the Charles. And of course, our Zimbabwean GRT, Tsitsi, who studied at Harvard undergrad and now is doing grad school at MIT. Her delicious baked chicken (as well as her multi-colored fruit mojito salad) was the centerpiece of many wonderful study breaks, and her smiles and hugs never fail to cheer us up after a long day at school. The stories would go on, but I guess what I want to say is that Im so thankful for my fellow dormies. They are as important to me as my fraternity brothers, and I would not place one over the other. So how do I feel about being in a fraternity and a close-knit dorm at the same time? I think the most challenging thing for me is to divide up my time between my fraternity and my dorm. It helps that only a handful of the brothers are living in the fraternity house at this point (were not a residential fraternity, yet), but the majority of fraternity events do occur at the house, so I still have to end up walking over (its about 15 minutes, on foot, for me to get from iHouse to my fraternity). I enjoy being in a fraternity because you can get instant access to many upperclassmen, who are often have a lot of MIT wisdom and can advise you well about a ton of things everything from finding an UROP, to doing well in your classes, or even relationship advice. Another great plus about being in a fraternity is that each brother has his own friendship circle, and you get to meet a lot of the friends of other brothers, which is great if you enjoy meeting new people. Furthermore, the fraternity as a whole often organizes many events, such as retreats, mixers with sororities (MIT, BU, Wellesleyetc.), dinners with faculty (like President Hockfield), and I find participating in those events to be very rewarding. Yet, at the same time, I like living in a dorm because of the different community that it offers from my fraternity, its proximity to campus, and the ability to meet a lot more freshman (or even just other students) through living in the dorms. Living in a fraternity, although great, tends to be a little bit more constraining because after leaving campus, all you see would just be your brothers and people who happen to be dropping by at the house (although I cant speak for this, since Ive never lived in my fraternity house). Of course, there would also be girls in your dorm, which is different from living in a fraternity house. (there are also the benefits and opportunities that iHouse specifically brings, but I wont mention them here because I dont think its pertinent in comparing dorm life v. fraternity life straight out) Tonight, I went over to my fraternity house, grabbed dinner, met many of our new potentials, and hung out at the house. Afterwards, I returned to iHouse, where there was a delicious aroma wafting from the kitchen (it turns out Kayla 12 was cooking dinner). I headed upstairs, played two LAN matches of Age of Mythology with Steve and Zach, celebrated the fact that Zach was just appointed Concertmaster of MITSO (MIT Symphonic Orchestra), and now here I am typing up this entry. I wont try to convince you to join a FSILG (fraternities, sororities, independent living groups), though I would definitely encourage you to give it a try. At the same time, I wont think any less of you if you live in a dorm. For me, I experienced quite a lot of both worlds, and Im happy to have found my balance. Now that isnt something Id trade any day. ;)

The Third Side of Fraternities

The Third Side of Fraternities PREMISES 1. This is an OPINION post. Not a suggestion post. Im not trying to debate about housing or even recommend to you what you should do. Im just trying to be honest. 2. When I explain what goes on in fraternities, Im basing everything primarily on my fraternity. The two dozen plus fraternities at MIT do not all have the same personality, so its not fair to categorize fraternal life into one big stereotype, whatever your stereotype may be. 3. I may not be always politically correct. I apologize for that in advance. Paul joined a fraternity, and now lives at his fraternity. Snively didnt join a fraternity, and lives at his dorm. I joined a fraternity, but I live at iHouse, a specialized dorm of 21 students (and Im not planning on moving out anytime soon). Not to jump on the bandwagon, but I think I supply the missing third side to this housing issue. But granted, I think theres a lot fewer students that live in a small dorm but is part of a fraternity, so I dont know how much my opinion matters or would apply to future students, but here goes. First off, I dont know when the dorms/fraternity debate became so heated. I just want to start off by saying that theres no reason to bash one or the other (Im not referring to anyone in particular), but dorm life and fraternal life is so different that I dont think it would be fair to compare one or the other on par. Joining a fraternity doesnt mean youre paying for friends, nor does not getting a bid during Rush imply that you are socially awkward. Being a fraternity guy, I just want to kind of talk about Rush. Like what numerous people have mentioned, Rush is not perfect. I wrote two entries ago that you should explore around a bit in the beginning (which is still good and sound advice), but I guess what I didnt emphasize is that if you really WANTED a bid, you need to settle down into one fraternity probably midway through Rush. So, precisely as Snively said, if you did Rush right (by constantly going to all the different fraternities), you might end up with no bids at all by the time Rush week ends. Equally flawed is the idea that you suddenly become brothers with people that you know after just one short week. After all, is it really possible for you do find the best match for your next four years by which dinners you chose to go to during Rush week? And, like mentioned in Snivelys entry, there is no pretty solution to this dilemma. But let me explain a bit about what goes on in chapter rooms during Rush week and the week before Rush (Work Week). I think this aspect is often skimmed over and thus it makes the process of Rush seem arbitrary and random, but there is a lot that goes on in fraternities before extending a bid. Getting a bid is a carefully, well-thought out process, and definitely not something that you get just because you show up to all the Rush events for a specific fraternity (but this is a popular misconception). One week prior to Rush week, the brothers who can make it back from MIT return to campus, and try begin planning for Rush. During this Work Week, renovations may be done on the house, assignments for Rush events are handed out, and the brothers generally hang out with each other after a long summer. Once Rush begins, different brothers are assigned to head events that happen each day, and each member of the fraternity try to go out and meet as many freshmen as possible. At the end of every night, all the fraternity men gather together at the house, plan tomorrows events, and talk about freshmen that they met today who may make good potentials. As Rush goes on, it becomes more and more important for interested freshmen to stick with a fraternity because basically there is no way for us to get to know you better if we only see you at one event! This is the reason why, technically, you need to settle into just one or two fraternities through middle of Rush week. This also facilitates for better discussion amongst the brothers at night because they would have known you better and thus have more things to say. Also, as the brothers get to know you better, the daily discussions would often progress from just general chatting (interests, activities) and hanging out to more serious discussions, such as what it means to join a fraternity and things like your values, ideals, ideasetc. Often, if you find that the attitude and the topics of discussion between you and the fraternity brothers segue into deeper talks, its a good sign that the brothers are considering you seriously as a potential future member of their fraternity. Towards the end of Rush week, especially the last two nights of Rush Week, the nightly meetings amongst the fraternity men get progressively longer and longer. As interested potentials start getting singled out, the discussions of the relative impressions and merits of each potential become the subject of careful examination (which often turns into long discussions). The meeting before Bid Day, (when bids or invitations to join the fraternity, are handed out to potentials) is often the longest meeting, as all the brothers go through all the potentials that still remain in the database and proceeds to talk about whether or not to extend a bid to them (for controversial potentials, it may even lead to debates). Last night was that meeting for my fraternity, and the brothers of my fraternity met for nearly five hours. Still think that getting a bid is arbitrary? For every night in the past week, there was practically no evening when I returned to my dorm before midnight, and often it was not until three in the morning. All of this effort goes into helping my fraternity select the best potentials as possible the potentials whom we believe best exemplifies our ideals and would contribute to our fraternal environment. Still, you protest, how is it possible for you to know whether youre the best fit for us in just ONE week?! I want to address this from two angles: First off, I believe that for a great number of potentials who accept bids from different fraternities, they start growing into the personalities and the character of the fraternity they join (and I think the same is true for a lot of dorm communities). Thus, in a lot of cases, you dont need to be best fit from the very beginning, since as time goes on and you get to know your brothers better, whichever fraternity you join would become the best fraternity for you. Moreover, after awhile, you really have no basis of comparison anyway (how would you know whether you would have been happier at another fraternity?) Although growing into the personality of the fraternity sounds risky and feels like youre losing the essence of your own personality, its not really the case. The personality of the fraternity is defined by the existing brothers who are part of the fraternity, and if you feel comfortable about them in the beginning, chances are that feeling wont fade as times go on (obviously, there are exceptions, but thats generally minor and besides the point). Second, this is the reason why my fraternity recruit year-round. If you dont feel comfortable joining, we wont force you. Plenty of potentials had turned down bids from us, but reconsidered their decision as they got to know us better. Moreover, doing Rush during your freshman year isnt mandatory, by any means! You may decide your sophomore year, after youve spent a year at MIT and gotten to know a bit more about Greek life, to Rush a particular fraternity that you find valuable. No one is asking you to make an impulsive decision. If you dont feel comfortable, then just leave! I dont know too much about other fraternities, but I know for a fact that my brothers and I would not just give you the cold shoulder after Rush if you turn down a bid from us. There are a lot of comments about the Rush process being judgmental and quiet kids getting shafted. I apologize about that stereotype as a fraternal member, but I maintain the stance that there is really no way to not come off as judgmental to some people when you only have a week to meet them! My fraternity places a key emphasis on trying not to perpetuate this bitter feeling, and thus we welcome you to continue to explore and talk to us throughout the year. At least for us (and I know at least of a couple more fraternities), Rush doesnt end after this week, if you dont want it to. - Now leaving fraternities, and talking about dorm-life. I love iHouse. I enjoy the intimacies that iHouse offers, with just 21 people in the dorm. Like wings in Baker and Next, entries in McGregor, or houses in Burton Conner, we are a community. Throughout the year, we discuss issues about international development, plan potential projects, go on awesome retreats, have great speaker dinners, and most importantly, just hang out and learn from each other by living with each other. You may have known Zach and Steve, my roommates from last year, from various blogs that I posted last year (if you dont, click on the iHouse link on the very top it redirects to our i3 video, which both of them were featured. I was the cameraman. =p). Throughout the last year, I dont know how many times Zach helped out on my physics psets, and helped me to secure the needed 85.2% (0.2% above the A cutoff!) for me to net that 5.0 GPA in 8.02. Steve was there with me through the presidential primaries, explaining to me which states were the key battleground states. He also introduced me to the world of American sports, and I remember all the time he spent in front of the television, waiting for the Patriots to lose, but being disappointed every time. And of course, they would remember the time when I almost burned down the room because my lamp nearly caught on fire at three in the morning (while theyre both deep asleep!). Going outside of the room, theres Tim 08, who would always be phenomenally annoyed when late-night revelers partied too loudly in the lounge (late-night was defined as past 10pm for him). Theres also Kathy 10, who taught me the secret of making really easy (but awesome-tasting!) garlic noodles, for which she is famous for. I remember staying up till 6 in the morning doing my 5.111 homework with Mary 11, who could have gone to sleep but wanted to stay up with me since I was up doing work. She fell asleep while studying 5.12 (which was her pretext of staying up), but I would remember that time when we were both so delirious from working at the end that we just stopped working to see the sun rise across the Charles. And of course, our Zimbabwean GRT, Tsitsi, who studied at Harvard undergrad and now is doing grad school at MIT. Her delicious baked chicken (as well as her multi-colored fruit mojito salad) was the centerpiece of many wonderful study breaks, and her smiles and hugs never fail to cheer us up after a long day at school. The stories would go on, but I guess what I want to say is that Im so thankful for my fellow dormies. They are as important to me as my fraternity brothers, and I would not place one over the other. So how do I feel about being in a fraternity and a close-knit dorm at the same time? I think the most challenging thing for me is to divide up my time between my fraternity and my dorm. It helps that only a handful of the brothers are living in the fraternity house at this point (were not a residential fraternity, yet), but the majority of fraternity events do occur at the house, so I still have to end up walking over (its about 15 minutes, on foot, for me to get from iHouse to my fraternity). I enjoy being in a fraternity because you can get instant access to many upperclassmen, who are often have a lot of MIT wisdom and can advise you well about a ton of things everything from finding an UROP, to doing well in your classes, or even relationship advice. Another great plus about being in a fraternity is that each brother has his own friendship circle, and you get to meet a lot of the friends of other brothers, which is great if you enjoy meeting new people. Furthermore, the fraternity as a whole often organizes many events, such as retreats, mixers with sororities (MIT, BU, Wellesleyetc.), dinners with faculty (like President Hockfield), and I find participating in those events to be very rewarding. Yet, at the same time, I like living in a dorm because of the different community that it offers from my fraternity, its proximity to campus, and the ability to meet a lot more freshman (or even just other students) through living in the dorms. Living in a fraternity, although great, tends to be a little bit more constraining because after leaving campus, all you see would just be your brothers and people who happen to be dropping by at the house (although I cant speak for this, since Ive never lived in my fraternity house). Of course, there would also be girls in your dorm, which is different from living in a fraternity house. (there are also the benefits and opportunities that iHouse specifically brings, but I wont mention them here because I dont think its pertinent in comparing dorm life v. fraternity life straight out) Tonight, I went over to my fraternity house, grabbed dinner, met many of our new potentials, and hung out at the house. Afterwards, I returned to iHouse, where there was a delicious aroma wafting from the kitchen (it turns out Kayla 12 was cooking dinner). I headed upstairs, played two LAN matches of Age of Mythology with Steve and Zach, celebrated the fact that Zach was just appointed Concertmaster of MITSO (MIT Symphonic Orchestra), and now here I am typing up this entry. I wont try to convince you to join a FSILG (fraternities, sororities, independent living groups), though I would definitely encourage you to give it a try. At the same time, I wont think any less of you if you live in a dorm. For me, I experienced quite a lot of both worlds, and Im happy to have found my balance. Now that isnt something Id trade any day. ;)

Essay Foreign Aid Programs are Good Politics - 1136 Words

Americans have historicly had many outlooks on foreign relations and the countrys proper place in them. On one extreme is the idea that the US government should use its power and influence as a globally acknowledged superpower to take a leading role in world affairs, to use its military strength to help promote peace and stability. The other side is that America is not the worlds policeman, that we must put our own interests as a nation first. The US Taxpayers Party, a recent addition to the list of nationally recognized political parties, leans clearly towards the second side. In their party platform, which can be found at http://www.USTaxpayers.org/ustp-96p.html, they call for US withdrawal†¦show more content†¦Another claim the US Taxpayers Party makes is that the US shouldnt send its armed forces as international peace-keepers, or to help settle disputes in foreign countries. Others who share this concept argue that the US military cant realisticly change these situ ations with military deployment, theyre just risking American lives. The Clinton Administration explains that there have positive impacts from the use of American military forces overseas. In Bosnia, a US plan for NATO airstrikes, combined with aggressive US diplomacy, has significantly improved the chances for a peace settlement. In Haiti, a fragile calm holds one year after US troops restored the democratically elected president and ended three years of military dictatorship. (Fosters). The United States does in fact have interests in almost all areas of todays world - beyond the economic ties we have with other countries, theres the danger that anarchy and war in seemingly isolated parts of the world can spread if its not contained. (Speaker) Many critics of Americas policies on foreign aid claim foreign countries have used America to build themselves up to a position of self-reliance, then refused to make promised or implied concessions to the US, when they no longer see the need to cater to American interests any longer. The aid is justified partly by a sense of charity and responsibility towards the world, but there were also politicalShow MoreRelatedForeign Aid From The United States918 Words   |  4 PagesWhen I chose Brazil as the subject country for examining its foreign aid received, I ran into a bit of a dilemma. Brazil has evolved from being a foreign aid recipient and less developed nation of the past, to become a major foreign aid provider in recent years. This fact places this emerging country in a unique and interesting position as both a donor and recipient as of 2010 records reveal and Brazil’s donor status is on the increase since this new â€Å"middle-of-the-road† development status for thisRead MoreThe Advantages and Disadvantages of Australian Aid884 Words   |  4 PagesAdvantages and Disadvantages of Aid to Australia – Geography Essay The purpose of Australian Aid is to help developing countries around the world eradicate poverty and to promote stability and prosperity both in our region and beyond, by providing different types of assistance and financial support. Although Australia receives a number of benefits due to aid, several disadvantages can also arise as a result of this link with different countries. Providing aid to developing countries in the Asia-PacificRead MoreShould The United States Increase Foreign Aid?819 Words   |  4 PagesStates increase foreign aid? This is a topic that has come up many times in the past years. When it comes to politics and the people themselves, this is a very important debate. This goes much deeper than just losing money or helping a fellow country in need. People are in need to better their country and themselves. We are all here together and aiding in one s growth can change lives all around. There are many reasons why the United States should increase foreign aid and why it is importantRead MoreChapter 2 Test Political Science Pearson Essay987 Words   |  4 Pages1) The strength of the economy is directly tied to the monetary value of all goods and services produced in a nation each year, which is called the ________. Gina coefficients for the economy Median household income Gross domestic product Poverty line Mass production factor 2) The degree of ________in the United States is unusually high compared to other developed countries. Religiosity Political idealism Racism Demographic homogeneity Civil liberty 3) Belief in which of the followingRead MoreThe United States Foreign Aid to Developing Countries: A Research Report1679 Words   |  7 Pagesworlds leader in foreign aid to developing countries. It gives foreign aid to such countries in order to promote political stability and economic prosperity, a natural interest for any global hegemon. This aid comes in the form of money, food, humanitarian work, and military assistance. The countries who receive the foreign aid certainly need assistance, but do not always use the aid wisely. Now that our country is undergoing serious fiscal deficits, the nations costly foreign aid commitments mustRead MoreDomestic Political State Of The Nation, Technological Advances, And Doctrinal Changes1511 Words   |  7 PagesThe Evolution of the Cost of War Analyzed through the Domestic Political State of the Nation, Technological Advances, and Doctrinal Changes Politics can be defined as the practice of influencing people through the exercise of power. The main way to control a person or a group of people is to control their finances. This is why the economy of the United States is so important. Without control of its finances, the nation is unable to exercise control internally or over other nations. There have beenRead MoreThe European Recovery Program Of The United States Essay1504 Words   |  7 PagesWorld War II, the United States of America lit the beacon of humanitarian aid. At its own discretion, after the Soviet Union’s refusal of America’s extent of influence and relief in the European continent, the U.S. was free to do as it pleased regarding attempts of foreign assistance. Secretary of State in the U.S. at the time, George Marshall, proposed the Marshall Plan†, originally called â€Å"the European Recovery Program†, in June of 1947, during his speech at Harvard University. Marshall’s argumentR ead MoreThe War Of The Civil Rights Movement1476 Words   |  6 Pagestime of peace and love, equality for all, the ongoing war in Vietnam, and Nixon. Each decade after one another affected the next with foreign policy, domestic policy, politics, political leadership, the economy, and the social terms of each decade. In 1945-1953, Harry Truman was in office and his foreign policy philosophy was containment. Some main events of foreign policy while he was in office was the Potsdam Conference, the Marshall Plan, and NATO. The Potsdam conference was located in GermanyRead MorePolitical Science And Its Influence On The Country s Current Situation Essay985 Words   |  4 Pagesteaches us about how political power is dispersed, how different governments operate and interact, how rules are made and enforced. We will come to know both the who of politics, such as international organizations, politicians, and the public, and the how†, such as political institutions, elections, and public administration. Politics have its essence in every aspect of our lives, including the availability of education, jobs, housing and healthcare. Whatever government does and whoever supports theRead MoreThe Effect of War and Peace on Foreign Aid Essay1520 Words   |  7 PagesThe Effect of War and Peace on Foreign Aid Dr. Toi Dennis Elaine Stewart SOC 300: Sociology of Developing Countries May 4, 2014 Introduction Afghanistan is a developing country; the country faced many difficulties soon after its independence. They faced difficulties in the development of their constitution and regulations. The selection of a leader was an issue and the first major task was to prepare a military for the

Essay on History of the Juvenile Justice System - 1477 Words

RUNNING HEAD: HISTORY OF THE JUVENILE JUSTICE SYSTEM Juvenile Delinquency: The History of the Juvenile Justice System Shandi Lillard Kaplan University CJ 150 – 02 Professor Raymond Keefauvor June 14, 2011 The History of the Juvenile Justice System The Juvenile Justice System is seen by many as being ineffective in treating the youth of this country, the programs are outdated and there seems to be little, if any hope that these youth will stay on the right path once released back into society. This paper will discuss the history of the Juvenile Justice System as well as how it has evolved since its inception. We will also discuss the â€Å"waiver process† that is used when transferring juveniles into the adult system, and what,†¦show more content†¦However, it wasn’t until 1899 that juveniles were awarded their own court in which to handle juvenile crimes; the first juvenile court was opened in Chicago and within 25 most states had followed suit and created their own juvenile courts (Americanbar.org). The courts worked on the doctrine of Parens Patriae, which means â€Å"Parent of the Country†, they treated each case on an individual basis, with the main goal being rehabilitation, most cases were treated as non-criminal, but courts at times did remove the youth from their homes and had them placed in reform schools as a part of that rehabilitation. The best interest of that child was always what was most important. The goals of the Juvenile Court were described best by one of the first presiding judges of the juvenile court, Judge Julian Mack, in which he stated: The child who must be brought into court should, of course, be made to know that he is face to face with the power of the state, but he should at the same time, and more emphatically, be made to feel that he is the object of its care and solicitude. The ordinary trappings of the courtroom are out of place in such hearings. The judge on a bench, looking down upon the boy standing at the bar, can neverShow MoreRelatedEssay on The History and Evolution of the Juvenile Justice System1368 Words   |  6 PagesThe history of the juvenile justice system is a mixture of the criminal justice system, family court, child protective services, social services, orphanages, adoption and humanitarian growth. (Schmalleger, 2007) Where a child fit into the system would depend on the crime, family pedigree, financial standing, color and social status. Children of color would be treated harsher than whites, Indian children were treated worse than African American Children, and status was determined by the color ofRead MoreEssay about History of the Juvenile Justice System2644 Words   |  11 Pagesdiscuss the history of the juvenile justice system and how it has come to be what it is today. When a juvenile offender commits a crime and is sentenced to jail or reform school, the offender goes to a separate jail or reforming place than an adult. It hasn’t always been this way. Until the early 1800’s juveniles were tried just like everyone else. Today, that is not the case. This paper will explain the reforms that have taken place within the criminal justice system that developed the juvenile ju sticeRead MoreFuture of the Juvenile Justice System1280 Words   |  6 PagesFuture of the Juvenile Justice System The future of the juvenile justice system is uncertain. There is a struggle to try a find a way to serve the needs of the juvenile delinquents and issue them a punishment for violating the law. In order to improve the direction of the juvenile justice system, recommendations are needed regarding community involvement, law enforcement, courts, corrections, and the private sector. These recommendations address issues that the system is currently facing and offersRead MoreBad Kids Race And The Transformation Of Juvenile Court1649 Words   |  7 PagesIn Bad Kids Race and the Transformation of Juvenile Court, Barry Feld provides a history as well as possible solutions to the problems that currently have a grapple hold on our juvenile justice system. Barry Feld is one of the nations most respected scholars of juvenile justice and currently teaches the subject, amongst other things, at the University of Minnesota. Feld himself graduated from law school at the University of Minnesota and l ater received his Ph.D. in sociology from Harvard. This book’sRead MoreJuvenile Justice System And Adult Justice Systems1589 Words   |  7 Pagesbe discussing both the juvenile and the adult justice systems. There are several differences between the two systems, which may surprise you. I will be discussing many aspects within the justice systems. These include Terminology, Due Process rights, the process of Arrest to Corrections, Juvenile crime compared to Adult crime, age limits and waivers for the adult system and the different community correctional options, which are available to the offenders. The two systems share many of the same termsRead MoreJuvenile Delinquency Is A Problem1508 Words   |  7 PagesJuvenile Delinquency When looking into the history of United States and elsewhere juvenile delinquency is a problem and has been one for over a century. Like other systems in place, the system involving juvenile delinquents has gone through many stages. In the case of the juvenile delinquency, it has gone through four stages, with us presently in the fourth. The causes behind juvenile delinquency are still unknown even today. Some blame it on the current culture, the over-exposure to violenceRead MoreAnalysis Of The Cycle Of Juvenile Justice1342 Words   |  6 PagesRunning head: CYCLE JUVENILE JUSTICE​ ​1 Analysis of the Cycle of Juvenile Justice Theory Name School ​​ Professor Class Date Analysis of the Cycle of Juvenile Justice Theory ​In the text, Thomas Bernard examines the cyclical nature of the juvenile justice system (Weisheit Culbertson, 2000, p. 13-31). The author posits that the implementation of juvenile justice is constantly swinging from one extreme to the other based, largely, on the public’s perceptionRead MoreThe Get-Tough Effectiveness Of Juvenile Recidivism. The1037 Words   |  5 PagesThe Get-Tough Effectiveness of Juvenile Recidivism The reason for this research paper is to examine the history and the purpose the juvenile system. We will also examine the history and effectiveness of the Get- tough Law on juvenile recidivism, followed with the overall conclusion of the research. The Juvenile justice system has undergone many changes since its establishment in the 1890s. These changes were implemented by the desire to have a justice system which is sensitive and responsive toRead MoreThe Role Of Parens Patriae Within The Criminal Justice System873 Words   |  4 Pagesthe concept of parens patriae within the Criminal Justice System corresponds with the shaping of juvenile justice. Throughout history, the Criminal Justice System seldom focused on the understanding of the relationship between children and criminal responsibility and the special needs of juveniles. Despite of age, juveniles were often overlooked and were typically processed and subject to the similar punishments as adults. Consequently, juveniles placed in the same facilities as adults who committedRead MoreThe High Incarceration Rate Of Juveniles1748 Words   |  7 PagesThe high incarceration rate of juveniles is a significant social problem that affects society as a whole as well as the yo uth’s individual welfare and developmental trajectory. Adolescents who are incarcerated in the juvenile justice system face a multitude of negative lifelong implications. The history of incarcerating youth in residential facilities such as juvenile halls, camps, ranches or group homes as a consequence for committing crimes has a deep-rooted history in the United States. â€Å"For more

Utilitarianism Theory And Contemporary Issues - 1350 Words

In today s society, we face many obstacles in our attempt to achieve the feeling of happiness. As intelligent beings, we try to solve these problems by taking the path that best benefits us. The theory of utilitarianism provides a solution to this but at what cost? What are the benefits and disadvantages of utilitarianism? Is utilitarianism an idea one should live by? What is utilitarianism? I plan on answering these questions within this paper and understand how they relate to everyday life. I will also look at arguments for and against utilitarianism. Then analyze the appealing and unappealing features to determine if utilitarianism should be followed as an absolute rule. Utilitarianism can be generally defined as a way of thinking where one chooses an action based on the amount of happiness that it would produce. In the book Ethics: Theory and Contemporary Issues, by Barbara MacKinnon and Andrew Fiala, the authors state â€Å"Utilitarianism is a form of consequentialism,† a nd that â€Å"John Stuart Mill explained it as ‘actions are right in proportion as they tend to promote happiness, wrong as they tend to produce the reverse of happiness.’† (MacKinnon 95). This means that utilitarianism focuses on result of an action based on happiness and that decisions can be taken made by looking at possible outcomes of that decision. What Mill stated would be defined as â€Å" the principle of utility or the greatest happiness principle.†( MacKinnon, 95). This principle is one in which could beShow MoreRelatedExplanation of the Utilitarian Ethical Theory Essay1417 Words   |  6 PagesExplanation of the Utilitarian Ethical Theory There are many different ethical approaches that deal with the morality issues we face every day, but the utilitarian approach holds the feeling of morally belonging to a group and the lack of individualism that many others carry. It also can be a very cold approach for those who belong to the minority in a society. This is because the principle of utility says that â€Å"we ought to do that which produces the greatest amount of happiness or pleasure forRead MoreThe Issues of Ethics970 Words   |  4 PagesIssues of Ethics The two major ethical theories that have the most relevance and prudence to my contemporary views are utilitarianism and those aligned with the concept of a categorical imperative. The philosophy of the former of these was widely pioneered by both Jeremy Bentham and John Stuart Mill. The notion of a categorical imperative was largely popularized by Immanuel Kant. In all actuality, the efficaciousness of these philosophies is widely determined by the particular moral dilemma whichRead MoreThe Argument On The Theory Of Utilitarianism891 Words   |  4 PagesMill has the view that there is a general misconception regarding the use of the term â€Å"Utilitarianism.† Most people refer to it when comparing between wrong and right in a restricted manner that is divergent to pleasure. The opponents of utilitarianism often attach everything with the element of pleasure; thus, contributing to denouncing the theory. However, the proponents of the theory of utilitarianism such as Epicuru s and Bentham asserted that it was pleasure in itself and the exclusion of painRead MoreEuthanasia: Kantianism vs Utilitarianism1599 Words   |  7 PagesThe deliberate act of ending another s life, given his or her consent, is formally referred to as euthanasia. At present, euthanasia is one of the most controversial social-ethical issues that we face, in that it deals with a sensitive subject matter where there is much uncertainty as to what position one ought to take. Deliberately killing another person is presumed by most rational people as a fundamental evil act. However, when that person gives his or her consent to do so, this seems to giveRead MoreThe Theory Of Action Theory1648 Words   |  7 PagesThe voluntaristic theory of action, commonly referred to as action theory by sociologists, was developed in the mid- twentieth century by Talcott Parsons. Parsons sought to create a unified doctrine of sociological study that earned sociology a place among the other sciences. Up to that point sociological studies were limited to two major schools of thought, namely utilitarianism and German idealism, both of which described parameters explored in voluntaristic action theory but lacked an encompassingRead MoreUtilitarian Ethics1587 Words   |  6 PagesUtilitarian Ethics Introduction Utilitarianism is an ideological theory introduced by Jeremy Bentham in the late 1780s to assist in solving the recurrent and adverse ethical cases, which confronted institutions, organizations/companies, as well as the society. The utilitarianism is an idea that the overall utility contribution of an action, solely determines the moral worth of that action, that is, the general perception by the public on the contribution of such action to peoples pleasure or happinessRead MoreCase Study About Moral of Hacking681 Words   |  3 PagesContemporary Practices in Information Technology 7WCM0005/7WCM0006 (SDL) Case Study - Coursework 1 The morality of hacking - Gary McKinnon – Did he break the British Computer Society Code of Conduct? Gary McKinnon was a Scottish Systems Administrator who in 2002 was accused of carrying out the â€Å"biggest military computer hack of all time†. McKinnon claimed that he was merely looking for evidence of a cover-up of Unidentified Flying Objects (UFO) activities. The US authorities claimed thatRead MoreThe Ethics Of The Death Of A Fetus1505 Words   |  7 Pagesdecision that should be given to the mother only. The issue of abortion remains to be one of the most controversial topics in society, which causes an inevitable clash of opinion. Through the exploration of philosophical principles, we are able to evaluate the origins of such opinions. In the same way, utilitarianism equates wrongness or blameworthiness of an action with its resultant pain or unhappiness. The central principle of utilitarianism expresses the belief that actions are right in proportionRead MoreEthical Egoism, Ethical Altruism, And Eudaimonia1660 Words   |  7 Pagesethical egoism differentiates from the ethical altruism in that while the latter is concerned with the welfare of others; the concern of the former is for the promotion of the interests of oneself. Moseley (n.p.) notes that ethical egoism is a normative theory that shares in the notion that â€Å"the pro motion of one’s good is in accordance with morality† (Moseley n.p.). This particular source notes that there is a robust and weak angle of the promotion of one’s good. The strong angle has it that; â€Å"it is alwaysRead MoreOn Utilitarianism and Kantian Ethics 1681 Words   |  7 Pages1. Introduction There is little doubt that Utilitarianism and Kantian Ethics are by far the two most important ethical theories throughout contemporary philosophy. Though both attempt to answer questions about morality and behavior, the two theories have many fundamental differences: one evaluates actions in terms of the utility they produce whereas the other considers whether actions fulfill duty; one emphasizes consequence where the other highlights intentions; one sees desire as essential while